Buildxact vs Raken
Buildxact vs Raken, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Buildxact is on 58/100 and Raken on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Buildxact
- funding raised: $28.5M against $12.0M
Raken
- our overall score: 62/100 against 58/100
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 42/100
- headcount: 153 against 93
- headcount growth: -7.4% against -9.8%
- LinkedIn following: 11,147 against 8,111
At a glance
| Measure | Buildxact | Raken |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud-based software for residential builders to streamline estimates, project management, and invoicing. | Construction field management software for daily reporting, time tracking, and safety. |
| Category | Construction Tech, Vertical SaaS, Project Management, Estimating Software | Construction Tech, Vertical SaaS, Project Management, Field Service Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Sydney, Australia | Salt Lake City, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Buildxact | Raken |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 93 | 153 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -9.8% | -7.4% |
| Total funding | $28.5M | $12.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series A |
| Valuation | $92.5M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,111 | 11,147 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Buildxact | Raken |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 63/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Buildxact | Raken |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS |
Buildxact vs Raken: common questions
Which is better, Buildxact or Raken?
On our 0-100 score Raken rates higher (62/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Buildxact and Raken compare on the numbers?
Buildxact leads on funding raised ($28.5M against $12.0M). Raken leads on our overall score (62/100 against 58/100), agent readiness (49/100 against 42/100), headcount (153 against 93), headcount growth (-7.4% against -9.8%), LinkedIn following (11,147 against 8,111).
Read the full Buildxact review and pricing or the Raken review and pricing. You can also browse other Buildxact alternatives we track.