Buildxact vs Fieldlens
Buildxact vs Fieldlens, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Buildxact is on 58/100 and Fieldlens on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Buildxact
- domain rating: 63/100 against 55/100
- funding raised: $28.5M against $17.7M
Fieldlens
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 42/100
At a glance
| Measure | Buildxact | Fieldlens |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud-based software for residential builders to streamline estimates, project management, and invoicing. | Real-time jobsite collaboration software connecting field and office teams in construction. |
| Category | Construction Tech, Vertical SaaS, Project Management, Estimating Software | Construction Tech, Vertical SaaS, Project Management, Collaboration Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Sydney, Australia | Tampa, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Buildxact | Fieldlens |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 93 | 99 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -9.8% | Not published |
| Total funding | $28.5M | $17.7M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series A |
| Valuation | $92.5M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,111 | 8,652 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Buildxact | Fieldlens |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 63/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Buildxact | Fieldlens |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Buildxact | Fieldlens |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 3 threads |
“WeWork has acquired 21 startups in the last four years, from a college messaging service to a real estate investing app. Here's everything WeWork has bought.. Spacious SpaceIQ Waltz Prolific Interactive Islands Media Managed by Q Euclid Ana”r/buzzfeedbot
Buildxact vs Fieldlens: common questions
Which is better, Buildxact or Fieldlens?
On our 0-100 score Fieldlens rates higher (59/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Buildxact and Fieldlens compare on the numbers?
Buildxact leads on domain rating (63/100 against 55/100), funding raised ($28.5M against $17.7M). Fieldlens leads on agent readiness (48/100 against 42/100).
What do real users say about Buildxact and Fieldlens?
Fieldlens: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/buzzfeedbot.
Read the full Buildxact review and pricing or the Fieldlens review and pricing. You can also browse other Buildxact alternatives we track.