Buildots vs NavVis
Buildots vs NavVis, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Buildots is on 63/100 and NavVis on 66/100.
Where each one leads
Buildots
- funding raised: $211M against $73.2M
NavVis
- domain rating: 70/100 against 53/100
- headcount: 413 against 227
- LinkedIn following: 55,761 against 22,802
At a glance
| Measure | Buildots | NavVis |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered construction intelligence platform transforming sites into digital environments for cost and time savings. | NavVis provides a spatial twin platform for the built world, offering reality capture solutions and a browser-based SaaS platform for managing and utilizing spatial data. |
| Category | Construction Tech, Proptech, Computer Vision, AI-Powered Analytics | Spatial Computing, Digital Twins, Enterprise Software, Industrial Technology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Munich, Germany |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Buildots | NavVis |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 227 | 413 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +34.7% | Not published |
| Total funding | $211M | $73.2M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| Valuation | $300M | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 22,802 | 55,761 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Buildots | NavVis |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 53/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Buildots | NavVis |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Matomo |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Buildots | NavVis |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread | Not published |
“My company is evaluating Buildots and Doxel for a large data center project. Has anyone used either of these companies for 360 images and automated progress tracking? What was your experience with them? Any insights would be appreciated.”r/ConstructionTech
Buildots vs NavVis: common questions
Which is better, Buildots or NavVis?
On our 0-100 score NavVis rates higher (66/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Buildots and NavVis compare on the numbers?
Buildots leads on funding raised ($211M against $73.2M). NavVis leads on domain rating (70/100 against 53/100), headcount (413 against 227), LinkedIn following (55,761 against 22,802).
What do real users say about Buildots and NavVis?
Buildots: 0 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/ConstructionTech.
Read the full Buildots review and pricing or the NavVis review and pricing. You can also browse other Buildots alternatives we track.