Buildots vs Hubexo
Buildots vs Hubexo, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Buildots is on 63/100 and Hubexo on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Buildots
- our overall score: 63/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 42/100
Hubexo
- headcount: 2,500 against 227
- funding raised: $410M against $211M
At a glance
| Measure | Buildots | Hubexo |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered construction intelligence platform transforming sites into digital environments for cost and time savings. | Construction data and business intelligence platform serving 50,000+ customers across 25 countries. |
| Category | Construction Tech, Proptech, Computer Vision, AI-Powered Analytics | Construction Tech, Data Analytics, Market Intelligence, SaaS |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B SaaS |
| Offering | Platform | Not published |
| Founded | 2018 | 1936 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Ljusdal, Sweden |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Buildots | Hubexo |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 227 | 2,500 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +34.7% | Not published |
| Total funding | $211M | $410M |
| Latest round | Not published | Private Equity |
| Valuation | $300M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 22,802 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Buildots | Hubexo |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 17/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 53/100 | 53/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Buildots | Hubexo |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | HubSpot, Zendesk | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Buildots | Hubexo |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread | Not published |
“My company is evaluating Buildots and Doxel for a large data center project. Has anyone used either of these companies for 360 images and automated progress tracking? What was your experience with them? Any insights would be appreciated.”r/ConstructionTech
Buildots vs Hubexo: common questions
Which is better, Buildots or Hubexo?
On our 0-100 score Buildots rates higher (63/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Buildots and Hubexo compare on the numbers?
Buildots leads on our overall score (63/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 42/100). Hubexo leads on headcount (2,500 against 227), funding raised ($410M against $211M).
What do real users say about Buildots and Hubexo?
Buildots: 0 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/ConstructionTech.
Read the full Buildots review and pricing or the Hubexo review and pricing. You can also browse other Buildots alternatives we track.