BuildOps vs Raken
BuildOps vs Raken, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: BuildOps is on 50/100 and Raken on 62/100.
Where each one leads
BuildOps
- domain rating: 68/100 against 59/100
- headcount: 641 against 153
- LinkedIn following: 27,470 against 11,147
Raken
- our overall score: 62/100 against 50/100
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 41/100
At a glance
| Measure | BuildOps | Raken |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Field service management software for the commercial trades industry. | Construction field management software for daily reporting, time tracking, and safety. |
| Category | Construction Tech, Vertical SaaS, Field Service Management, Workflow Automation | Construction Tech, Vertical SaaS, Project Management, Field Service Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Diego, United States | Salt Lake City, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | BuildOps | Raken |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 641 | 153 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -7.4% |
| Total funding | Not published | $12.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,470 | 11,147 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | BuildOps | Raken |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 76/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 68/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | BuildOps | Raken |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
BuildOps vs Raken: common questions
Which is better, BuildOps or Raken?
On our 0-100 score Raken rates higher (62/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do BuildOps and Raken compare on the numbers?
BuildOps leads on domain rating (68/100 against 59/100), headcount (641 against 153), LinkedIn following (27,470 against 11,147). Raken leads on our overall score (62/100 against 50/100), agent readiness (49/100 against 41/100).
Read the full BuildOps review and pricing or the Raken review and pricing. You can also browse other BuildOps alternatives we track.