Build38 vs Veracode
Build38 vs Veracode, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Build38 is on 47/100 and Veracode on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Build38
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Veracode
- our overall score: 62/100 against 47/100
- domain rating: 80/100 against 42/100
- headcount: 503 against 48
- funding raised: $40.0M against $2.5M
- LinkedIn following: 85,248 against 7,743
At a glance
| Measure | Build38 | Veracode |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered app protection and management platform for mobile applications. | Veracode provides a SaaS platform for application security testing and risk management. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Mobile Security, Application Security, Threat Detection | Cybersecurity, SaaS, Software Development |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2019 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Burlington, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Build38 | Veracode |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 48 | 503 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -10.4% |
| Total funding | $2.5M | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series F |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,743 | 85,248 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Build38 | Veracode |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 47/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 42/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Build38 | Veracode |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Build38 | Veracode |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Mobile In-App Protection, Active Hardening, Threat Intelligence & Response, Comprehensive Threat Protection, Compliance & Cost Reduction | Not published |
Build38 vs Veracode: common questions
Which is better, Build38 or Veracode?
On our 0-100 score Veracode rates higher (62/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Build38 and Veracode compare on the numbers?
Veracode leads on our overall score (62/100 against 47/100), domain rating (80/100 against 42/100), headcount (503 against 48), funding raised ($40.0M against $2.5M), LinkedIn following (85,248 against 7,743).
Read the full Build38 review and pricing or the Veracode review and pricing. You can also browse other Build38 alternatives we track.