Bud vs Tink
Bud vs Tink, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Bud is on 62/100 and Tink on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Bud
- headcount growth: +17.4% against -28.1%
Tink
- our overall score: 67/100 against 62/100
- agent readiness: 35/100 against 30/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 55/100
- funding raised: $299M against $100M
- LinkedIn following: 65,102 against 20,432
At a glance
| Measure | Bud | Tink |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Customer intelligence platform for modern banking, transforming transaction data into revenue opportunities. | European open banking platform enabling financial data access, payments, and financial service development. |
| Category | Fintech, Open Banking, Data Intelligence, AI | Fintech, Open Banking, Payments, API Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Stockholm, Sweden |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Bud | Tink |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 306 | 328 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +17.4% | -28.1% |
| Total funding | $100M | $299M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,432 | 65,102 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Bud | Tink |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | F (35/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Bud | Tink |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | Webflow | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Segment, Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
Bud vs Tink: common questions
Which is better, Bud or Tink?
On our 0-100 score Tink rates higher (67/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Bud and Tink compare on the numbers?
Bud leads on headcount growth (+17.4% against -28.1%). Tink leads on our overall score (67/100 against 62/100), agent readiness (35/100 against 30/100), domain rating (73/100 against 55/100), funding raised ($299M against $100M), LinkedIn following (65,102 against 20,432).
Read the full Bud review and pricing or the Tink review and pricing. You can also browse other Bud alternatives we track.