BrowserUse vs Mastra
BrowserUse vs Mastra, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: BrowserUse is on 52/100 and Mastra on 77/100.
Where each one leads
BrowserUse
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Mastra
- our overall score: 77/100 against 52/100
- headcount: 53 against 20
- funding raised: $35.5M against $17.0M
At a glance
| Measure | BrowserUse | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Provides tools and services for automated browser testing and scraping. | An open-source TypeScript/JavaScript framework for building AI agents, from the creators of Gatsby. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Tool, Web Scraping, Browser Automation | Agentic AI, AI Agents, Developer Tools, Open Source |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2022 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | BrowserUse | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 20 | 53 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +204.5% |
| Total funding | $17.0M | $35.5M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 6,591 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | BrowserUse | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 77/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 70/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 90/100 |
| Community | Not published | 38/100 |
| Search visibility | 20/100 | 68/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (59/100) | D (58/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | BrowserUse | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Open source | Yes | Yes, 15,100 GitHub stars |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | BrowserUse | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | AI Agent Framework, Workflows, RAG, Evals, Memory & Tool Selection, Open Source & Modular |
What users say
| Measure | BrowserUse | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 5.0/5 from 2 votes |
BrowserUse vs Mastra: common questions
Which is better, BrowserUse or Mastra?
On our 0-100 score Mastra rates higher (77/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do BrowserUse and Mastra compare on the numbers?
Mastra leads on our overall score (77/100 against 52/100), headcount (53 against 20), funding raised ($35.5M against $17.0M).
Read the full BrowserUse review and pricing or the Mastra review and pricing. You can also browse other BrowserUse alternatives we track.