BrowserUse vs Graas
BrowserUse vs Graas, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: BrowserUse is on 52/100 and Graas on 61/100.
Where each one leads
BrowserUse
- agent readiness: 59/100 against 40/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 63/100
Graas
- our overall score: 61/100 against 52/100
- headcount: 271 against 20
- funding raised: $49.0M against $17.0M
At a glance
| Measure | BrowserUse | Graas |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Provides tools and services for automated browser testing and scraping. | AI platform for automating business processes and customer interactions. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Tool, Web Scraping, Browser Automation | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Conversational Commerce, E-commerce |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2022 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | BrowserUse | Graas |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 20 | 271 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -6.7% |
| Total funding | $17.0M | $49.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Pre-Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 11,372 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | BrowserUse | Graas |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 20/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (59/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 63/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | BrowserUse | Graas |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
BrowserUse vs Graas: common questions
Which is better, BrowserUse or Graas?
On our 0-100 score Graas rates higher (61/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do BrowserUse and Graas compare on the numbers?
BrowserUse leads on agent readiness (59/100 against 40/100), domain rating (72/100 against 63/100). Graas leads on our overall score (61/100 against 52/100), headcount (271 against 20), funding raised ($49.0M against $17.0M).
Read the full BrowserUse review and pricing or the Graas review and pricing. You can also browse other BrowserUse alternatives we track.