Brookfield Asset Management vs Pagaya Investments
Brookfield Asset Management vs Pagaya Investments, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Brookfield Asset Management is on 9/100 and Pagaya Investments on 65/100.
Where each one leads
Brookfield Asset Management
- domain rating: 76/100 against 59/100
Pagaya Investments
- our overall score: 65/100 against 9/100
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 24/100
At a glance
| Measure | Brookfield Asset Management | Pagaya Investments |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A leading global alternative asset manager focused on infrastructure, renewable energy, real estate, and credit. | AI-powered network enabling financial institutions to expand customer access and scale lending. |
| Category | Fintech, Asset Management, Infrastructure, Renewable Energy | Fintech, Asset Management, Fixed Income, Credit |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Brookfield Asset Management | Pagaya Investments |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 463 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -14.3% |
| Total funding | Not published | $1.4B |
| Latest round | Not published | Credit Facility |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.3B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 70,861 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Brookfield Asset Management | Pagaya Investments |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 9/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 80/100 |
| Search visibility | 10/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (24/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Brookfield Asset Management | Pagaya Investments |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Brookfield Asset Management vs Pagaya Investments: common questions
Which is better, Brookfield Asset Management or Pagaya Investments?
On our 0-100 score Pagaya Investments rates higher (65/100 against 9/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Brookfield Asset Management and Pagaya Investments compare on the numbers?
Brookfield Asset Management leads on domain rating (76/100 against 59/100). Pagaya Investments leads on our overall score (65/100 against 9/100), agent readiness (55/100 against 24/100).
Read the full Brookfield Asset Management review and pricing or the Pagaya Investments review and pricing. You can also browse other Brookfield Asset Management alternatives we track.