Bringg vs HQ
Bringg vs HQ, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Bringg is on 64/100 and HQ on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Bringg
- our overall score: 64/100 against 57/100
- domain rating: 70/100 against 29/100
- headcount: 350 against 174
- funding raised: $170M against $12.0M
- LinkedIn following: 23,709 against 7,485
HQ
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 44/100
- headcount growth: +29.6% against +10.0%
At a glance
| Measure | Bringg | HQ |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Enterprise-grade delivery and fulfillment orchestration platform for last-mile logistics. | Enterprise solution for corporate ground transportation booking, billing, and payment. |
| Category | Delivery, Transport and Logistics, Mobility, LogisticsTech | Mobility, Ride Service, Route Optimization, Travel Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Chicago, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Bringg | HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 350 | 174 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +10.0% | +29.6% |
| Total funding | $170M | $12.0M |
| Latest round | Series E | Strategic |
| Valuation | $1.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 23,709 | 7,485 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Bringg | HQ |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 70/100 | 29/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Bringg | HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
Bringg vs HQ: common questions
Which is better, Bringg or HQ?
On our 0-100 score Bringg rates higher (64/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Bringg and HQ compare on the numbers?
Bringg leads on our overall score (64/100 against 57/100), domain rating (70/100 against 29/100), headcount (350 against 174), funding raised ($170M against $12.0M), LinkedIn following (23,709 against 7,485). HQ leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 44/100), headcount growth (+29.6% against +10.0%).
Read the full Bringg review and pricing or the HQ review and pricing. You can also browse other Bringg alternatives we track.