BridgeCrew vs Hunters AI
BridgeCrew vs Hunters AI, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: BridgeCrew is on 54/100 and Hunters AI on 70/100.
Where each one leads
BridgeCrew
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Hunters AI
- our overall score: 70/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 21/100
- headcount: 180 against 6
- funding raised: $118M against $18.0M
- LinkedIn following: 25,421 against 4,807
At a glance
| Measure | BridgeCrew | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Security as code platform for cloud infrastructure protection. | AI-powered SOC platform automating threat detection, investigation, and response for security teams. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Infrastructure, DevOps | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Extended Detection and Response, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2019 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | BridgeCrew | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 6 | 180 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -30.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $18.0M | $118M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,807 | 25,421 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | BridgeCrew | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 45/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 56/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 65/100 | 61/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | BridgeCrew | Hunters AI |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
BridgeCrew vs Hunters AI: common questions
Which is better, BridgeCrew or Hunters AI?
On our 0-100 score Hunters AI rates higher (70/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do BridgeCrew and Hunters AI compare on the numbers?
Hunters AI leads on our overall score (70/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 21/100), headcount (180 against 6), funding raised ($118M against $18.0M), LinkedIn following (25,421 against 4,807).
Read the full BridgeCrew review and pricing or the Hunters AI review and pricing. You can also browse other BridgeCrew alternatives we track.