BridgeCrew vs Cockroach Labs
BridgeCrew vs Cockroach Labs, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: BridgeCrew is on 54/100 and Cockroach Labs on 66/100.
Where each one leads
BridgeCrew
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Cockroach Labs
- our overall score: 66/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 78/100 against 65/100
- headcount: 722 against 6
- funding raised: $308M against $18.0M
- LinkedIn following: 123,428 against 4,807
At a glance
| Measure | BridgeCrew | Cockroach Labs |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Security as code platform for cloud infrastructure protection. | Cloud-native distributed SQL database for mission-critical applications requiring high availability and scalability. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Infrastructure, DevOps | Enterprise, Infrastructure, Database Management, Enterprise Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2019 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | BridgeCrew | Cockroach Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 6 | 722 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -30.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $18.0M | $308M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series E |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,807 | 123,428 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | BridgeCrew | Cockroach Labs |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 45/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 13/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 65/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | BridgeCrew | Cockroach Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Netlify |
| CDN | Not detected | Netlify |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Segment |
| Open source | No | Yes |
BridgeCrew vs Cockroach Labs: common questions
Which is better, BridgeCrew or Cockroach Labs?
On our 0-100 score Cockroach Labs rates higher (66/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do BridgeCrew and Cockroach Labs compare on the numbers?
Cockroach Labs leads on our overall score (66/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 21/100), domain rating (78/100 against 65/100), headcount (722 against 6), funding raised ($308M against $18.0M), LinkedIn following (123,428 against 4,807).
Read the full BridgeCrew review and pricing or the Cockroach Labs review and pricing. You can also browse other BridgeCrew alternatives we track.