Breathe Cities vs Xpansiv
Breathe Cities vs Xpansiv, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Breathe Cities is on 48/100 and Xpansiv on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Breathe Cities
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Xpansiv
- our overall score: 57/100 against 48/100
- domain rating: 68/100 against 41/100
- headcount: 250 against 14
- funding raised: $100M against $45.0M
- LinkedIn following: 16,059 against 2,041
At a glance
| Measure | Breathe Cities | Xpansiv |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A global initiative focused on improving air quality and safeguarding public health in urban environments. | Global commodity data and analytics platform for ESG and energy markets. |
| Category | Climate Tech, Environmental Monitoring, Public Health, Urban Planning | Climate Tech, Energy, Commodity Data, ESG |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2G | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Platform |
| Founded | Not published | 2016 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Breathe Cities | Xpansiv |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 14 | 250 |
| Total funding | $45.0M | $100M |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,041 | 16,059 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Breathe Cities | Xpansiv |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 41/100 | 68/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Breathe Cities | Xpansiv |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Azure |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager |
Breathe Cities vs Xpansiv: common questions
Which is better, Breathe Cities or Xpansiv?
On our 0-100 score Xpansiv rates higher (57/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Breathe Cities and Xpansiv compare on the numbers?
Xpansiv leads on our overall score (57/100 against 48/100), domain rating (68/100 against 41/100), headcount (250 against 14), funding raised ($100M against $45.0M), LinkedIn following (16,059 against 2,041).
Read the full Breathe Cities review and pricing or the Xpansiv review and pricing. You can also browse other Breathe Cities alternatives we track.