Breathe Cities vs Urecsys
Breathe Cities vs Urecsys, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Breathe Cities is on 48/100 and Urecsys on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Breathe Cities
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 41/100 against 8/100
- funding raised: $45.0M against $14.0M
Urecsys
- our overall score: 53/100 against 48/100
- headcount: 27 against 14
At a glance
| Measure | Breathe Cities | Urecsys |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A global initiative focused on improving air quality and safeguarding public health in urban environments. | Urecsys optimizes indoor air quality by using AI and machine learning to adjust outdoor airflow based on real-time pollution levels. |
| Category | Climate Tech, Environmental Monitoring, Public Health, Urban Planning | Smart Building, Air Quality, Indoor, Outdoor |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2G | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2012 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Seoul, South Korea |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Breathe Cities | Urecsys |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 14 | 27 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +11.5% |
| Total funding | $45.0M | $14.0M |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Series A |
| Valuation | Not published | $50.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,041 | 1,751 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Breathe Cities | Urecsys |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | Not published | 50/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 41/100 | 8/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Breathe Cities | Urecsys |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Analytics 4 |
Breathe Cities vs Urecsys: common questions
Which is better, Breathe Cities or Urecsys?
On our 0-100 score Urecsys rates higher (53/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Breathe Cities and Urecsys compare on the numbers?
Breathe Cities leads on agent readiness (39/100 against 21/100), domain rating (41/100 against 8/100), funding raised ($45.0M against $14.0M). Urecsys leads on our overall score (53/100 against 48/100), headcount (27 against 14).
Read the full Breathe Cities review and pricing or the Urecsys review and pricing. You can also browse other Breathe Cities alternatives we track.