Breathe Cities vs Stormfisher
Breathe Cities vs Stormfisher, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Breathe Cities is on 48/100 and Stormfisher on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Breathe Cities
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 33/100
- domain rating: 41/100 against 34/100
Stormfisher
- our overall score: 62/100 against 48/100
- headcount: 53 against 14
- funding raised: $430M against $45.0M
- LinkedIn following: 9,514 against 2,041
At a glance
| Measure | Breathe Cities | Stormfisher |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A global initiative focused on improving air quality and safeguarding public health in urban environments. | Develops, owns, and operates industrial-scale facilities producing green hydrogen derived e-Fuels. |
| Category | Climate Tech, Environmental Monitoring, Public Health, Urban Planning | Climate Tech, Clean Energy, Green Hydrogen, Hydrogen |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2G | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | Not published | 2006 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | London, Canada |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Breathe Cities | Stormfisher |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 14 | 53 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +46.9% |
| Total funding | $45.0M | $430M |
| Latest round | Funding Round | PE Round |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,041 | 9,514 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Breathe Cities | Stormfisher |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | F (33/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 41/100 | 34/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Breathe Cities | Stormfisher |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager |
Breathe Cities vs Stormfisher: common questions
Which is better, Breathe Cities or Stormfisher?
On our 0-100 score Stormfisher rates higher (62/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Breathe Cities and Stormfisher compare on the numbers?
Breathe Cities leads on agent readiness (39/100 against 33/100), domain rating (41/100 against 34/100). Stormfisher leads on our overall score (62/100 against 48/100), headcount (53 against 14), funding raised ($430M against $45.0M), LinkedIn following (9,514 against 2,041).
Read the full Breathe Cities review and pricing or the Stormfisher review and pricing. You can also browse other Breathe Cities alternatives we track.