Breathe Cities vs South Pole
Breathe Cities vs South Pole, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Breathe Cities is on 48/100 and South Pole on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Breathe Cities
- funding raised: $45.0M against $20.0M
South Pole
- our overall score: 63/100 against 48/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 41/100
- headcount: 839 against 14
- LinkedIn following: 160,775 against 2,041
At a glance
| Measure | Breathe Cities | South Pole |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A global initiative focused on improving air quality and safeguarding public health in urban environments. | Global climate solutions provider helping organizations achieve net-zero emissions. |
| Category | Climate Tech, Environmental Monitoring, Public Health, Urban Planning | Climate Tech, Sustainability, Carbon Credits, Energy Transition |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2G | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | Not published | 2006 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Zurich, Switzerland |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Breathe Cities | South Pole |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 14 | 839 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -9.6% |
| Total funding | $45.0M | $20.0M |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Corporate Round |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,041 | 160,775 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Breathe Cities | South Pole |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 41/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Breathe Cities | South Pole |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager |
Breathe Cities vs South Pole: common questions
Which is better, Breathe Cities or South Pole?
On our 0-100 score South Pole rates higher (63/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Breathe Cities and South Pole compare on the numbers?
Breathe Cities leads on funding raised ($45.0M against $20.0M). South Pole leads on our overall score (63/100 against 48/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 39/100), domain rating (76/100 against 41/100), headcount (839 against 14), LinkedIn following (160,775 against 2,041).
Read the full Breathe Cities review and pricing or the South Pole review and pricing. You can also browse other Breathe Cities alternatives we track.