Breathe Cities vs Greenpixie
Breathe Cities vs Greenpixie, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Breathe Cities is on 48/100 and Greenpixie on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Breathe Cities
- funding raised: $45.0M against $6.0M
Greenpixie
- our overall score: 55/100 against 48/100
- headcount: 26 against 14
- LinkedIn following: 7,472 against 2,041
At a glance
| Measure | Breathe Cities | Greenpixie |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A global initiative focused on improving air quality and safeguarding public health in urban environments. | Sustainability intelligence for cloud and AI infrastructure. |
| Category | Climate Tech, Environmental Monitoring, Public Health, Urban Planning | Climate Tech, Sustainability, Cloud Infrastructure, AI Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2G | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2021 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Breathe Cities | Greenpixie |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 14 | 26 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +500.0% |
| Total funding | $45.0M | $6.0M |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Pre-Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,041 | 7,472 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Breathe Cities | Greenpixie |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 48/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 42/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 41/100 | 41/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Breathe Cities | Greenpixie |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
Breathe Cities vs Greenpixie: common questions
Which is better, Breathe Cities or Greenpixie?
On our 0-100 score Greenpixie rates higher (55/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Breathe Cities and Greenpixie compare on the numbers?
Breathe Cities leads on funding raised ($45.0M against $6.0M). Greenpixie leads on our overall score (55/100 against 48/100), headcount (26 against 14), LinkedIn following (7,472 against 2,041).
Read the full Breathe Cities review and pricing or the Greenpixie review and pricing. You can also browse other Breathe Cities alternatives we track.