BrainWatch Tech vs EarlySense
BrainWatch Tech vs EarlySense, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: BrainWatch Tech is on 49/100 and EarlySense on 65/100.
Where each one leads
BrainWatch Tech
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
EarlySense
- our overall score: 65/100 against 49/100
- domain rating: 38/100 against 1/100
- headcount: 18 against 2
- funding raised: $131M against $1.0M
- LinkedIn following: 10,030 against 310
At a glance
| Measure | BrainWatch Tech | EarlySense |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Automated, continuous monitoring system for pupillary size & reflex in severe brain injury patients. | EarlySense provides a continuous patient monitoring solution to enhance safety and reduce risk for general care patients. |
| Category | Healthcare, Pupil, Monitor, Sensor | Healthcare, Monitor, Patient, MedTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2004 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Ramat Gan, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | BrainWatch Tech | EarlySense |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2 | 18 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -27.2% |
| Total funding | $1.0M | $131M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series F |
| Valuation | Not published | $325M |
| LinkedIn followers | 310 | 10,030 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | BrainWatch Tech | EarlySense |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 49/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 35/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 20/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 1/100 | 38/100 |
BrainWatch Tech vs EarlySense: common questions
Which is better, BrainWatch Tech or EarlySense?
On our 0-100 score EarlySense rates higher (65/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do BrainWatch Tech and EarlySense compare on the numbers?
EarlySense leads on our overall score (65/100 against 49/100), domain rating (38/100 against 1/100), headcount (18 against 2), funding raised ($131M against $1.0M), LinkedIn following (10,030 against 310).
Read the full BrainWatch Tech review and pricing or the EarlySense review and pricing. You can also browse other BrainWatch Tech alternatives we track.