BrainQ vs Inner Cosmos
BrainQ vs Inner Cosmos, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: BrainQ is on 56/100 and Inner Cosmos on 54/100.
Where each one leads
BrainQ
- domain rating: 36/100 against 26/100
- headcount: 29 against 15
- funding raised: $45.3M against $10.0M
- LinkedIn following: 8,150 against 1,815
Inner Cosmos
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 40/100
At a glance
| Measure | BrainQ | Inner Cosmos |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Bioelectric medicine company advancing neurorecovery for stroke and neurological conditions. | Developing a digital pill to rebalance brain networks using imperceptible micro-stimulations. |
| Category | Healthcare, Neurology, Mental Health, Strokes | Healthcare, Brain, Sensor, Human Machine Interface |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | BrainQ | Inner Cosmos |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 29 | 15 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +2.1% |
| Total funding | $45.3M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,150 | 1,815 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | BrainQ | Inner Cosmos |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 47/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 36/100 | 26/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | BrainQ | Inner Cosmos |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Hetzner |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Hotjar |
What users say
| Measure | BrainQ | Inner Cosmos |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 4 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“Daily Crunch: Israel-based stroke therapy tech startup BrainQ raises $40M.”r/techcrunch
BrainQ vs Inner Cosmos: common questions
Which is better, BrainQ or Inner Cosmos?
On our 0-100 score BrainQ rates higher (56/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do BrainQ and Inner Cosmos compare on the numbers?
BrainQ leads on domain rating (36/100 against 26/100), headcount (29 against 15), funding raised ($45.3M against $10.0M), LinkedIn following (8,150 against 1,815). Inner Cosmos leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 40/100).
What do real users say about BrainQ and Inner Cosmos?
BrainQ: 4 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/techcrunch.
Read the full BrainQ review and pricing or the Inner Cosmos review and pricing. You can also browse other BrainQ alternatives we track.