Box, Inc. vs Iris.ai
Box, Inc. vs Iris.ai, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Box, Inc. is on 35/100 and Iris.ai on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Box, Inc.
- domain rating: 91/100 against 60/100
- headcount: 4,406 against 40
- headcount growth: +29.3% against -25.9%
- funding raised: $888M against $10.4M
- LinkedIn following: 212,856 against 10,536
Iris.ai
- our overall score: 58/100 against 35/100
At a glance
| Measure | Box, Inc. | Iris.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud content management platform for enterprise file storage, collaboration, and workflow automation, leveraging AI for enhanced security and insights. | AI knowledge foundation for regulated enterprises, turning complex data into AI you can trust. |
| Category | Cloud Content Management, File Sharing, Collaboration Software, Enterprise Software | AI Foundation & Compute, Agentic AI, RAG, Foundation Model |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software | platform |
| Founded | 2005 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Redwood City, United States | Oslo, Norway |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Box, Inc. | Iris.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 4,406 | 40 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +29.3% | -25.9% |
| Total funding | $888M | $10.4M |
| Latest round | Private Equity | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 212,856 | 10,536 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Box, Inc. | Iris.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 35/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 45/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 15/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 60/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Box, Inc. | Iris.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Angular, Tailwind CSS |
Box, Inc. vs Iris.ai: common questions
Which is better, Box, Inc. or Iris.ai?
On our 0-100 score Iris.ai rates higher (58/100 against 35/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Box, Inc. and Iris.ai compare on the numbers?
Box, Inc. leads on domain rating (91/100 against 60/100), headcount (4,406 against 40), headcount growth (+29.3% against -25.9%), funding raised ($888M against $10.4M), LinkedIn following (212,856 against 10,536). Iris.ai leads on our overall score (58/100 against 35/100).
Read the full Box, Inc. review and pricing or the Iris.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other Box, Inc. alternatives we track.