Box, Inc. vs iManage Work
Box, Inc. vs iManage Work, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Box, Inc. is on 35/100 and iManage Work on 10/100.
Where each one leads
Box, Inc.
- our overall score: 35/100 against 10/100
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 72/100
- headcount: 4,406 against 1,278
- LinkedIn following: 212,856 against 73,812
iManage Work
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Box, Inc. | iManage Work |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud content management platform for enterprise file storage, collaboration, and workflow automation, leveraging AI for enhanced security and insights. | AI-powered platform for legal and professional services to manage documents, emails, and knowledge. |
| Category | Cloud Content Management, File Sharing, Collaboration Software, Enterprise Software | LegalTech, Enterprise Software, Document Management, Knowledge Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2005 | 1995 |
| Headquarters | Redwood City, United States | Chicago, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Box, Inc. | iManage Work |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 4,406 | 1,278 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +29.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $888M | Not published |
| Latest round | Private Equity | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 212,856 | 73,812 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Box, Inc. | iManage Work |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 35/100 | 10/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 45/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 15/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Box, Inc. | iManage Work |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Box, Inc. vs iManage Work: common questions
Which is better, Box, Inc. or iManage Work?
On our 0-100 score Box, Inc. rates higher (35/100 against 10/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Box, Inc. and iManage Work compare on the numbers?
Box, Inc. leads on our overall score (35/100 against 10/100), agent readiness (52/100 against 36/100), domain rating (91/100 against 72/100), headcount (4,406 against 1,278), LinkedIn following (212,856 against 73,812).
Read the full Box, Inc. review and pricing or the iManage Work review and pricing. You can also browse other Box, Inc. alternatives we track.