Bota vs Mastra
Bota vs Mastra, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Bota is on 57/100 and Mastra on 77/100.
Where each one leads
Bota
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Mastra
- our overall score: 77/100 against 57/100
- agent readiness: 58/100 against 44/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 5/100
- headcount: 53 against 4
- funding raised: $35.5M against $2.7M
At a glance
| Measure | Bota | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Bridging AI agents and the real world: $0 --> $710K cARR in 5 weeks | An open-source TypeScript/JavaScript framework for building AI agents, from the creators of Gatsby. |
| Category | Developer Tools, B2B, Agentic AI, AI Agents | Agentic AI, AI Agents, Developer Tools, Open Source |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | hardware | platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2020 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Bota | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 4 | 53 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +204.5% |
| Total funding | $2.7M | $35.5M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 6,591 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Bota | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 77/100 |
| Traction | 39/100 | 70/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 90/100 |
| Community | Not published | 38/100 |
| Search visibility | 14/100 | 68/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (58/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 5/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Bota | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| CMS | Framer | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Open source | No | Yes, 15,100 GitHub stars |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Bota | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | AI Agent Framework, Workflows, RAG, Evals, Memory & Tool Selection, Open Source & Modular |
What users say
| Measure | Bota | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 5.0/5 from 2 votes |
Bota vs Mastra: common questions
Which is better, Bota or Mastra?
On our 0-100 score Mastra rates higher (77/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Bota and Mastra compare on the numbers?
Mastra leads on our overall score (77/100 against 57/100), agent readiness (58/100 against 44/100), domain rating (76/100 against 5/100), headcount (53 against 4), funding raised ($35.5M against $2.7M).
Read the full Bota review and pricing or the Mastra review and pricing. You can also browse other Bota alternatives we track.