Body Vision Medical vs Nanox Vision
Body Vision Medical vs Nanox Vision, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Body Vision Medical is on 58/100 and Nanox Vision on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Body Vision Medical
- our overall score: 58/100 against 52/100
- headcount growth: -9.3% against -26.3%
Nanox Vision
- domain rating: 55/100 against 27/100
- headcount: 118 against 32
- funding raised: $105M against $28.5M
- LinkedIn following: 9,547 against 6,475
At a glance
| Measure | Body Vision Medical | Nanox Vision |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops AI-driven, real-time intraoperative imaging for early lung cancer diagnostics and treatment. | Developing a commercial-grade digital X-ray source for real-world medical imaging applications to reduce costs. |
| Category | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, Lung, Cancer | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, MedTech, HealthTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Campbell, United States | Neve Ilan, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Body Vision Medical | Nanox Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 32 | 118 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -9.3% | -26.3% |
| Total funding | $28.5M | $105M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series B2 |
| Valuation | Not published | $600M |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,475 | 9,547 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Body Vision Medical | Nanox Vision |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 3/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 55/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 27/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Body Vision Medical | Nanox Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CMS | Wix | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Body Vision Medical | Nanox Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 1.0/5 from 1 vote | Not published |
Body Vision Medical vs Nanox Vision: common questions
Which is better, Body Vision Medical or Nanox Vision?
On our 0-100 score Body Vision Medical rates higher (58/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Body Vision Medical and Nanox Vision compare on the numbers?
Body Vision Medical leads on our overall score (58/100 against 52/100), headcount growth (-9.3% against -26.3%). Nanox Vision leads on domain rating (55/100 against 27/100), headcount (118 against 32), funding raised ($105M against $28.5M), LinkedIn following (9,547 against 6,475).
Read the full Body Vision Medical review and pricing or the Nanox Vision review and pricing. You can also browse other Body Vision Medical alternatives we track.