BoardClic vs Turing
BoardClic vs Turing, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: BoardClic is on 32/100 and Turing on 71/100.
Where each one leads
BoardClic
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Turing
- our overall score: 71/100 against 32/100
- domain rating: 74/100 against 31/100
- headcount: 6,765 against 22
- funding raised: $395M against $42.9M
- LinkedIn following: 1,952,484 against 2,836
At a glance
| Measure | BoardClic | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | BoardClic provides a digital platform for board and executive team evaluations, offering data-driven insights to improve governance and performance. | AI-powered talent cloud connecting companies with pre-vetted remote software developers globally. |
| Category | Governance Software, Board Management Software, Executive Performance Management, SaaS | Talent Cloud, Remote Work, AI-Powered Hiring, Developer Talent |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | Not published | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Stockholm, Sweden | Palo Alto, United States |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | BoardClic | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 22 | 6,765 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +27.5% |
| Total funding | $42.9M | $395M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series E |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.2B |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,836 | 1,952,484 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | BoardClic | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 32/100 | 71/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | 13/100 | 18/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 54/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 31/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | BoardClic | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| CMS | Framer | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel | Not detected |
| Support stack | Intercom, HubSpot | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | BoardClic | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 4.0/5 from 1 vote |
BoardClic vs Turing: common questions
Which is better, BoardClic or Turing?
On our 0-100 score Turing rates higher (71/100 against 32/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do BoardClic and Turing compare on the numbers?
Turing leads on our overall score (71/100 against 32/100), domain rating (74/100 against 31/100), headcount (6,765 against 22), funding raised ($395M against $42.9M), LinkedIn following (1,952,484 against 2,836).
Read the full BoardClic review and pricing or the Turing review and pricing. You can also browse other BoardClic alternatives we track.