Blumira vs Exabeam
Blumira vs Exabeam, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Blumira is on 59/100 and Exabeam on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Blumira
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Exabeam
- our overall score: 69/100 against 59/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 44/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 66/100
- headcount: 794 against 72
- LinkedIn following: 51,918 against 7,959
At a glance
| Measure | Blumira | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Security operations platform that reduces alert volume for security teams. | Exabeam provides a cloud-native cybersecurity platform combining SIEM and UEBA to detect, investigate, and respond to threats using AI. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence, Threat Detection, Security Operations | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Information Technology (IT) |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Ann Arbor, USA | Foster City, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Blumira | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 72 | 794 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +2.8% |
| Total funding | Not published | $390M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series F |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $2.4B |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,959 | 51,918 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Blumira | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 66/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Blumira | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, PostHog, Hotjar | Google Tag Manager, Matomo |
| Support stack | Zendesk | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Blumira vs Exabeam: common questions
Which is better, Blumira or Exabeam?
On our 0-100 score Exabeam rates higher (69/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Blumira and Exabeam compare on the numbers?
Exabeam leads on our overall score (69/100 against 59/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 44/100), domain rating (76/100 against 66/100), headcount (794 against 72), LinkedIn following (51,918 against 7,959).
Read the full Blumira review and pricing or the Exabeam review and pricing. You can also browse other Blumira alternatives we track.