Blueground vs QuintoAndar
Blueground vs QuintoAndar, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Blueground is on 56/100 and QuintoAndar on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Blueground
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
QuintoAndar
- our overall score: 59/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 38/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 5/100
- funding raised: $744M against $59.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Blueground | QuintoAndar |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Proptech company reinventing the way people live by making apartments available where, when, and on the terms they want. | Brazilian proptech platform simplifying real estate rentals and sales through technology. |
| Category | Proptech, Real Estate Technology, Hospitality, Marketplace | Proptech, Real Estate Technology, Marketplace, Fintech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2013 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | New York, Greece | São Paulo, Brazil |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Blueground | QuintoAndar |
|---|---|---|
| Total funding | $59.0M | $744M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series E (Extension) |
| Valuation | $1.0B | $5.1B |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Blueground | QuintoAndar |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 15/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 5/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Blueground | QuintoAndar |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment |
Blueground vs QuintoAndar: common questions
Which is better, Blueground or QuintoAndar?
On our 0-100 score QuintoAndar rates higher (59/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Blueground and QuintoAndar compare on the numbers?
QuintoAndar leads on our overall score (59/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (52/100 against 38/100), domain rating (76/100 against 5/100), funding raised ($744M against $59.0M).
Read the full Blueground review and pricing or the QuintoAndar review and pricing. You can also browse other Blueground alternatives we track.