Bloomberg L.P. vs OpenGamma
Bloomberg L.P. vs OpenGamma, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Bloomberg L.P. is on 82/100 and OpenGamma on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Bloomberg L.P.
- our overall score: 82/100 against 60/100
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 92/100 against 58/100
- headcount: 26,382 against 51
- funding raised: $60B against $10.0M
- LinkedIn following: 2,216,283 against 43,803
OpenGamma
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Bloomberg L.P. | OpenGamma |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global financial, software, data, and media company providing real-time information and analytics. | Provides a cloud-native platform for risk analytics and derivatives trading for financial institutions. |
| Category | Fintech, Financial Services, Data Analytics, Media | Fintech, Risk Management, Derivatives Trading, Financial Services |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | services | platform | Platform |
| Founded | 1981 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Bloomberg L.P. | OpenGamma |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 26,382 | 51 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +5.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $60B | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series C |
| Valuation | $43B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,216,283 | 43,803 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Bloomberg L.P. | OpenGamma |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 82/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 79/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 96/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 92/100 | 58/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Bloomberg L.P. | OpenGamma |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Netlify |
| CDN | Not detected | Netlify |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Bloomberg L.P. | OpenGamma |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 2 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“Bloomberg. For the discussion of the Bloomberg Terminal ONLY. Not affiliated with Bloomberg LP”r/
Bloomberg L.P. vs OpenGamma: common questions
Which is better, Bloomberg L.P. or OpenGamma?
On our 0-100 score Bloomberg L.P. rates higher (82/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Bloomberg L.P. and OpenGamma compare on the numbers?
Bloomberg L.P. leads on our overall score (82/100 against 60/100), agent readiness (49/100 against 41/100), domain rating (92/100 against 58/100), headcount (26,382 against 51), funding raised ($60B against $10.0M), LinkedIn following (2,216,283 against 43,803).
What do real users say about Bloomberg L.P. and OpenGamma?
Bloomberg L.P.: 1 positive and 2 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track.
Read the full Bloomberg L.P. review and pricing or the OpenGamma review and pricing. You can also browse other Bloomberg L.P. alternatives we track.