Bloom Energy vs Crusoe Energy
Bloom Energy vs Crusoe Energy, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Bloom Energy is on 58/100 and Crusoe Energy on 64/100.
Where each one leads
Bloom Energy
- headcount: 2,228 against 1,386
- LinkedIn following: 151,951 against 72,418
Crusoe Energy
- our overall score: 64/100 against 58/100
At a glance
| Measure | Bloom Energy | Crusoe Energy |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Designs, manufactures, and installs solid oxide fuel cell systems for on-site power generation. | Crusoe Energy is an AI factory company that designs, builds, and operates renewable-powered AI infrastructure. |
| Category | Energy & Climate Tech, Clean Energy, Green Hydrogen, Hydrogen | Energy & Climate Tech, Climate Tech, Clean Energy, Green Hydrogen |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware, software, services |
| Founded | 2001 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | Denver, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Bloom Energy | Crusoe Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,228 | 1,386 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +11.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | $760M | $610M |
| Latest round | Post IPO | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | 151,951 | 72,418 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Bloom Energy | Crusoe Energy |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Bloom Energy | Crusoe Energy |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Bloom Energy vs Crusoe Energy: common questions
Which is better, Bloom Energy or Crusoe Energy?
On our 0-100 score Crusoe Energy rates higher (64/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Bloom Energy and Crusoe Energy compare on the numbers?
Bloom Energy leads on headcount (2,228 against 1,386), LinkedIn following (151,951 against 72,418). Crusoe Energy leads on our overall score (64/100 against 58/100).
Read the full Bloom Energy review and pricing or the Crusoe Energy review and pricing. You can also browse other Bloom Energy alternatives we track.