Bloods AI vs C2i Genomics
Bloods AI vs C2i Genomics, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Bloods AI is on 29/100 and C2i Genomics on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Bloods AI
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 30/100
- headcount: 28 against 17
- headcount growth: +155.4% against -20.8%
C2i Genomics
- our overall score: 62/100 against 29/100
- domain rating: 63/100 against 50/100
- LinkedIn following: 6,366 against 987
At a glance
| Measure | Bloods AI | C2i Genomics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered blood analysis for precise substance tracing and classification in healthcare and research. | Comprehensive whole-genome monitoring for cancer recurrence and progression. |
| Category | Healthcare, Blood, Spectrometry, Sensor | Healthcare, Genomics, Cancer, Tumor Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Bloods AI | C2i Genomics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 28 | 17 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +155.4% | -20.8% |
| Total funding | Not published | $112M |
| Latest round | Bootstrapped | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 987 | 6,366 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Bloods AI | C2i Genomics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 29/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 15/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 90/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 50/100 | 63/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Bloods AI | C2i Genomics |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
Bloods AI vs C2i Genomics: common questions
Which is better, Bloods AI or C2i Genomics?
On our 0-100 score C2i Genomics rates higher (62/100 against 29/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Bloods AI and C2i Genomics compare on the numbers?
Bloods AI leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 30/100), headcount (28 against 17), headcount growth (+155.4% against -20.8%). C2i Genomics leads on our overall score (62/100 against 29/100), domain rating (63/100 against 50/100), LinkedIn following (6,366 against 987).
Read the full Bloods AI review and pricing or the C2i Genomics review and pricing. You can also browse other Bloods AI alternatives we track.

