BlockSec vs CyVers
BlockSec vs CyVers, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: BlockSec is on 46/100 and CyVers on 55/100.
Where each one leads
BlockSec
- domain rating: 65/100 against 38/100
CyVers
- our overall score: 55/100 against 46/100
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 52/100
- headcount: 37 against 28
- funding raised: $9.0M against $1.0M
- LinkedIn following: 5,336 against 922
At a glance
| Measure | BlockSec | CyVers |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Web3 security platform providing on-chain monitoring, incident response, and risk management. | Web3 attack remediation platform using geometric machine learning for real-time cryptocurrency attack detection. |
| Category | Web3, Blockchain, DeFi, Cybersecurity | Web3, Blockchain, DeFi, Cybersecurity |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Singapore, Singapore | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | BlockSec | CyVers |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 28 | 37 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +13.2% |
| Total funding | $1.0M | $9.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 922 | 5,336 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | BlockSec | CyVers |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 46/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 45/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 46/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | C (66/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 65/100 | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | BlockSec | CyVers |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Render |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Base44 |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Agentic commerceMachine-readable checkout or agent payment rails | X402 | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
BlockSec vs CyVers: common questions
Which is better, BlockSec or CyVers?
On our 0-100 score CyVers rates higher (55/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do BlockSec and CyVers compare on the numbers?
BlockSec leads on domain rating (65/100 against 38/100). CyVers leads on our overall score (55/100 against 46/100), agent readiness (66/100 against 52/100), headcount (37 against 28), funding raised ($9.0M against $1.0M), LinkedIn following (5,336 against 922).
Read the full BlockSec review and pricing or the CyVers review and pricing. You can also browse other BlockSec alternatives we track.