Bleckwen vs OpenGamma
Bleckwen vs OpenGamma, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Bleckwen is on 53/100 and OpenGamma on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Bleckwen
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
OpenGamma
- our overall score: 60/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 35/100
- domain rating: 58/100 against 44/100
- headcount: 51 against 13
- LinkedIn following: 43,803 against 3,594
At a glance
| Measure | Bleckwen | OpenGamma |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered real-time fraud detection and prevention platform for financial institutions. | Provides a cloud-native platform for risk analytics and derivatives trading for financial institutions. |
| Category | Fintech, Fraud Detection, Cybersecurity, AI-Driven Parametric Insurance | Fintech, Risk Management, Derivatives Trading, Financial Services |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2016 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Bleckwen | OpenGamma |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 13 | 51 |
| Total funding | $10.0M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,594 | 43,803 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Bleckwen | OpenGamma |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 46/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (35/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 44/100 | 58/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Bleckwen | OpenGamma |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Netlify |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Netlify |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight, Facebook Pixel | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Bleckwen vs OpenGamma: common questions
Which is better, Bleckwen or OpenGamma?
On our 0-100 score OpenGamma rates higher (60/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Bleckwen and OpenGamma compare on the numbers?
OpenGamma leads on our overall score (60/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (41/100 against 35/100), domain rating (58/100 against 44/100), headcount (51 against 13), LinkedIn following (43,803 against 3,594).
Read the full Bleckwen review and pricing or the OpenGamma review and pricing. You can also browse other Bleckwen alternatives we track.