Bisly vs QuintoAndar
Bisly vs QuintoAndar, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Bisly is on 32/100 and QuintoAndar on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Bisly
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
QuintoAndar
- our overall score: 59/100 against 32/100
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 40/100
- funding raised: $744M against $10.8M
At a glance
| Measure | Bisly | QuintoAndar |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Flexible, no-code building automation that scales with your project. | Brazilian proptech platform simplifying real estate rentals and sales through technology. |
| Category | Proptech, Real Estate Technology, AI-Driven Property Management, Tenant Experience | Proptech, Real Estate Technology, Marketplace, Fintech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2021 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | São Paulo, Brazil |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Bisly | QuintoAndar |
|---|---|---|
| Total funding | $10.8M | $744M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series E (Extension) |
| Valuation | Not published | $5.1B |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Bisly | QuintoAndar |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 32/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 35/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 4/100 | 15/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 40/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Bisly | QuintoAndar |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment |
Bisly vs QuintoAndar: common questions
Which is better, Bisly or QuintoAndar?
On our 0-100 score QuintoAndar rates higher (59/100 against 32/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Bisly and QuintoAndar compare on the numbers?
QuintoAndar leads on our overall score (59/100 against 32/100), agent readiness (52/100 against 41/100), domain rating (76/100 against 40/100), funding raised ($744M against $10.8M).
Read the full Bisly review and pricing or the QuintoAndar review and pricing. You can also browse other Bisly alternatives we track.