Bioplasmar vs Shockwave Medical
Bioplasmar vs Shockwave Medical, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Bioplasmar is on 29/100 and Shockwave Medical on 66/100.
Where each one leads
Bioplasmar
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Shockwave Medical
- our overall score: 66/100 against 29/100
- domain rating: 59/100 against 9/100
At a glance
| Measure | Bioplasmar | Shockwave Medical |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Bioplasmar is developing a novel plasma-based technology for advanced wound care and tissue regeneration. | Develops intravascular lithotripsy technology for treating calcified cardiovascular lesions. |
| Category | MedTech, HealthTech, Biotech, Wound Care | MedTech, HealthTech, Medical Devices, Cardiovascular Devices |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2011 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Santa Clara, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Bioplasmar | Shockwave Medical |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 1,542 |
| Total funding | Not published | $200M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 120,592 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Bioplasmar | Shockwave Medical |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 29/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 6/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 42/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 9/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Bioplasmar | Shockwave Medical |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Hetzner | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Bioplasmar | Shockwave Medical |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread | Not published |
“Edital Ref.ª CDL CTTRI 307 SGRH 2023 exercício de atividades de investigação na área científica de Química, com vista ao desenvolvimento de trabalhos de desenvolvimento de metodologias de deteção de microplásticos, assim como ensaios de bio”r/empregopublico
Bioplasmar vs Shockwave Medical: common questions
Which is better, Bioplasmar or Shockwave Medical?
On our 0-100 score Shockwave Medical rates higher (66/100 against 29/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Bioplasmar and Shockwave Medical compare on the numbers?
Shockwave Medical leads on our overall score (66/100 against 29/100), domain rating (59/100 against 9/100).
What do real users say about Bioplasmar and Shockwave Medical?
Bioplasmar: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/empregopublico.
Read the full Bioplasmar review and pricing or the Shockwave Medical review and pricing. You can also browse other Bioplasmar alternatives we track.