BioLife Solutions vs Thermo Fisher Scientific
BioLife Solutions vs Thermo Fisher Scientific, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: BioLife Solutions is on 54/100 and Thermo Fisher Scientific on 78/100.
Where each one leads
BioLife Solutions
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Thermo Fisher Scientific
- our overall score: 78/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 86/100 against 49/100
- headcount: 100,104 against 193
- funding raised: $5.5B against $96.4M
- LinkedIn following: 2,298,918 against 10,520
At a glance
| Measure | BioLife Solutions | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops and markets bioproduction tools for cell and gene therapy manufacturing and distribution. | Global leader in serving science, providing analytical instruments, consumables, and services for research, diagnostics, and manufacturing. |
| Category | Biotech, MedTech, HealthTech, Cell and Gene Therapy | Life Sciences, Analytical Instruments, Laboratory Equipment, Biotechnology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | hardware | services | platform | Platform |
| Founded | 1987 | 1956 |
| Headquarters | Bothell, United States | Waltham, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | BioLife Solutions | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 193 | 100,104 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +21.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $96.4M | $5.5B |
| Latest round | Private Placement | Debt |
| Valuation | Not published | $220B |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,520 | 2,298,918 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | BioLife Solutions | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 78/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 99/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 49/100 | 86/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | BioLife Solutions | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
BioLife Solutions vs Thermo Fisher Scientific: common questions
Which is better, BioLife Solutions or Thermo Fisher Scientific?
On our 0-100 score Thermo Fisher Scientific rates higher (78/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do BioLife Solutions and Thermo Fisher Scientific compare on the numbers?
Thermo Fisher Scientific leads on our overall score (78/100 against 54/100), domain rating (86/100 against 49/100), headcount (100,104 against 193), funding raised ($5.5B against $96.4M), LinkedIn following (2,298,918 against 10,520).
Read the full BioLife Solutions review and pricing or the Thermo Fisher Scientific review and pricing. You can also browse other BioLife Solutions alternatives we track.