BioLamina vs CTIBIOTECH USA
BioLamina vs CTIBIOTECH USA, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: BioLamina is on 45/100 and CTIBIOTECH USA on 46/100.
Where each one leads
BioLamina
- domain rating: 37/100 against 30/100
- funding raised: $41.9M against $4.3M
CTIBIOTECH USA
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 21/100
At a glance
| Measure | BioLamina | CTIBIOTECH USA |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing and manufacturing laminin-based cell culture substrates for advanced cell therapies and drug discovery. | North American subsidiary of CTIBIOTECH, a leader in 3D bioprinting of human tissue. |
| Category | Biotechnology, Life Sciences, HealthTech, Cell Therapy | Biotechnology, Healthcare, 3D Printing, Regenerative Medicine |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | 2009 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | Stockholm, Sweden | Philadelphia, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | BioLamina | CTIBIOTECH USA |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 22 |
| Total funding | $41.9M | $4.3M |
| Latest round | Venture Debt | Undisclosed |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 7,543 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | BioLamina | CTIBIOTECH USA |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 45/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | 38/100 | 47/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 15/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 37/100 | 30/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | BioLamina | CTIBIOTECH USA |
|---|---|---|
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Astro |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
BioLamina vs CTIBIOTECH USA: common questions
Which is better, BioLamina or CTIBIOTECH USA?
On our 0-100 score CTIBIOTECH USA rates higher (46/100 against 45/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do BioLamina and CTIBIOTECH USA compare on the numbers?
BioLamina leads on domain rating (37/100 against 30/100), funding raised ($41.9M against $4.3M). CTIBIOTECH USA leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 21/100).
Read the full BioLamina review and pricing or the CTIBIOTECH USA review and pricing. You can also browse other BioLamina alternatives we track.

