BioCatch vs Cloudprint
BioCatch vs Cloudprint, compared side by side on 9 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: BioCatch is on 69/100 and Cloudprint on 9/100.
Where each one leads
BioCatch
- positive user sentiment: 100% positive against 17% positive
- our overall score: 69/100 against 9/100
- agent readiness: 36/100 against 31/100
Cloudprint
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | BioCatch | Cloudprint |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Behavioral biometrics platform that analyzes human-device interaction patterns to detect fraud and authenticate users. | Cloudprint is a platform providing secure, serverless cloud printing solutions for enterprise environments. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Authentication, Threat Detection, Identity & Access | Enterprise Software, Cloud Infrastructure, Workflow Automation, Cybersecurity |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | BioCatch | Cloudprint |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 459 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +18.4% | Not published |
| Total funding | $348M | Not published |
| Latest round | Secondary Transaction | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 53,524 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | BioCatch | Cloudprint |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 9/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 43/100 | 15/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | F (31/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | BioCatch | Cloudprint |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | BioCatch | Cloudprint |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 6 positive, 0 negative across 6 threads | 1 positive, 4 negative across 6 threads |
“Nasdaq Verafin and BioCatch Form Strategic Partnership to Accelerate the Global Fight Against Financial Crime.”r/Quantisnow
“CloudPrint is now built into Thingiverse! Easy!”r/3Dprinting
BioCatch vs Cloudprint: common questions
Which is better, BioCatch or Cloudprint?
On our 0-100 score BioCatch rates higher (69/100 against 9/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 9 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do BioCatch and Cloudprint compare on the numbers?
BioCatch leads on positive user sentiment (100% positive against 17% positive), our overall score (69/100 against 9/100), agent readiness (36/100 against 31/100).
What do real users say about BioCatch and Cloudprint?
BioCatch: 6 positive and 0 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Quantisnow. Cloudprint: 1 positive and 4 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/3Dprinting.
Read the full BioCatch review and pricing or the Cloudprint review and pricing. You can also browse other BioCatch alternatives we track.