Biobeat vs Oxitone
Biobeat vs Oxitone, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Biobeat is on 50/100 and Oxitone on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Biobeat
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 38/100
- domain rating: 42/100 against 33/100
- headcount: 72 against 10
- LinkedIn following: 18,881 against 1,282
Oxitone
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Biobeat | Oxitone |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Med-tech company with AI-powered remote patient monitoring using wearable sensors. | Oxitone is a digital health company providing continuous remote care for people with severe chronic conditions using wearables. |
| Category | Healthcare, Biomarkers, Patient, Monitor | Healthcare, Patient, Monitoring, Wearable |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Biobeat | Oxitone |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 72 | 10 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +28.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | Not published | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 18,881 | 1,282 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Biobeat | Oxitone |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 19/100 | 45/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 42/100 | 33/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Biobeat | Oxitone |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Self Managed |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
Biobeat vs Oxitone: common questions
Which is better, Biobeat or Oxitone?
On our 0-100 score Biobeat rates higher (50/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Biobeat and Oxitone compare on the numbers?
Biobeat leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 38/100), domain rating (42/100 against 33/100), headcount (72 against 10), LinkedIn following (18,881 against 1,282).
Read the full Biobeat review and pricing or the Oxitone review and pricing. You can also browse other Biobeat alternatives we track.