Biobeat vs Olive Diagnostics
Biobeat vs Olive Diagnostics, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Biobeat is on 50/100 and Olive Diagnostics on 47/100.
Where each one leads
Biobeat
- our overall score: 50/100 against 47/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 37/100
- headcount: 72 against 18
- headcount growth: +28.0% against -11.1%
- LinkedIn following: 18,881 against 1,619
Olive Diagnostics
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Biobeat | Olive Diagnostics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Med-tech company with AI-powered remote patient monitoring using wearable sensors. | Passive optical sensor for real-time health alerts and disease progression monitoring. |
| Category | Healthcare, Biomarkers, Patient, Monitor | Healthcare, Personal, Monitor, Biomarkers |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B, B2C |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2016 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Biobeat | Olive Diagnostics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 72 | 18 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +28.0% | -11.1% |
| Total funding | Not published | $1.5M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 18,881 | 1,619 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Biobeat | Olive Diagnostics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 47/100 |
| Traction | 19/100 | 44/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 42/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Biobeat | Olive Diagnostics |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
Biobeat vs Olive Diagnostics: common questions
Which is better, Biobeat or Olive Diagnostics?
On our 0-100 score Biobeat rates higher (50/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Biobeat and Olive Diagnostics compare on the numbers?
Biobeat leads on our overall score (50/100 against 47/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 37/100), headcount (72 against 18), headcount growth (+28.0% against -11.1%), LinkedIn following (18,881 against 1,619).
Read the full Biobeat review and pricing or the Olive Diagnostics review and pricing. You can also browse other Biobeat alternatives we track.