Binah.ai vs Heramed
Binah.ai vs Heramed, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Binah.ai is on 58/100 and Heramed on 46/100.
Where each one leads
Binah.ai
- our overall score: 58/100 against 46/100
- domain rating: 52/100 against 34/100
- headcount: 45 against 18
- funding raised: $13.5M against $600K
- LinkedIn following: 10,565 against 2,094
Heramed
- headcount growth: -2.4% against -14.3%
At a glance
| Measure | Binah.ai | Heramed |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered video health data platform for remote vital sign monitoring via smartphone. | HeraMED develops innovative connected pregnancy monitoring solutions, empowering women with medical-grade fetal monitoring for home use. |
| Category | Healthcare, Video, Monitor, HealthTech | Healthcare, Monitor, Pregnancy, MedTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2016 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Netanya, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Binah.ai | Heramed |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 45 | 18 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -14.3% | -2.4% |
| Total funding | $13.5M | $600K |
| Latest round | Series B | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,565 | 2,094 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Binah.ai | Heramed |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 42/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | Not published |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 52/100 | 34/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Binah.ai | Heramed |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Binah.ai vs Heramed: common questions
Which is better, Binah.ai or Heramed?
On our 0-100 score Binah.ai rates higher (58/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Binah.ai and Heramed compare on the numbers?
Binah.ai leads on our overall score (58/100 against 46/100), domain rating (52/100 against 34/100), headcount (45 against 18), funding raised ($13.5M against $600K), LinkedIn following (10,565 against 2,094). Heramed leads on headcount growth (-2.4% against -14.3%).
Read the full Binah.ai review and pricing or the Heramed review and pricing. You can also browse other Binah.ai alternatives we track.