Binah.ai vs HAGAR
Binah.ai vs HAGAR, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Binah.ai is on 58/100 and HAGAR on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Binah.ai
- domain rating: 52/100 against 24/100
- headcount: 45 against 24
- LinkedIn following: 10,565 against 4,088
HAGAR
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 39/100
- funding raised: $21.1M against $13.5M
At a glance
| Measure | Binah.ai | HAGAR |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered video health data platform for remote vital sign monitoring via smartphone. | Global physician-only community and medical crowdsourcing platform for real-world case collaboration. |
| Category | Healthcare, Video, Monitor, HealthTech | Healthcare, Diabetes, Glucose, Monitor |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B, B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2016 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Binah.ai | HAGAR |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 45 | 24 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -14.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $13.5M | $21.1M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,565 | 4,088 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Binah.ai | HAGAR |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 52/100 | 24/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Binah.ai | HAGAR |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Wix |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Facebook Pixel |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Binah.ai vs HAGAR: common questions
Which is better, Binah.ai or HAGAR?
On our 0-100 score Binah.ai rates higher (58/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Binah.ai and HAGAR compare on the numbers?
Binah.ai leads on domain rating (52/100 against 24/100), headcount (45 against 24), LinkedIn following (10,565 against 4,088). HAGAR leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 39/100), funding raised ($21.1M against $13.5M).
Read the full Binah.ai review and pricing or the HAGAR review and pricing. You can also browse other Binah.ai alternatives we track.