BigPanda.io vs Epsagon
BigPanda.io vs Epsagon, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: BigPanda.io is on 70/100 and Epsagon on 62/100.
Where each one leads
BigPanda.io
- our overall score: 70/100 against 62/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 64/100
- headcount: 334 against 16
- funding raised: $306M against $30.1M
- LinkedIn following: 53,484 against 7,042
Epsagon
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | BigPanda.io | Epsagon |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | BigPanda provides an AIOps platform that automates incident management and prevents service outages for large enterprises. | Automated observability and tracing for microservices to fix issues faster. |
| Category | Enterprise, Information Technology (IT), Service Operations, AIOps | Enterprise, Information Technology (IT), Serverless, Microservices |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | BigPanda.io | Epsagon |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 334 | 16 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -21.9% |
| Total funding | $306M | $30.1M |
| Latest round | Series E | Series A |
| Valuation | $1.2B | $200M |
| LinkedIn followers | 53,484 | 7,042 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | BigPanda.io | Epsagon |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 48/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 64/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | BigPanda.io | Epsagon |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | BigPanda.io | Epsagon |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads | Not published |
“Remote Solutions Engineer and Senior Solutions Engineer Positions Available, NodeJS on AWS. I'm not a recruiter. I'm a current Senior Solutions Engineer at BigPanda.io.”r/remotejs
BigPanda.io vs Epsagon: common questions
Which is better, BigPanda.io or Epsagon?
On our 0-100 score BigPanda.io rates higher (70/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do BigPanda.io and Epsagon compare on the numbers?
BigPanda.io leads on our overall score (70/100 against 62/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 22/100), domain rating (72/100 against 64/100), headcount (334 against 16), funding raised ($306M against $30.1M), LinkedIn following (53,484 against 7,042).
What do real users say about BigPanda.io and Epsagon?
BigPanda.io: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/remotejs.
Read the full BigPanda.io review and pricing or the Epsagon review and pricing. You can also browse other BigPanda.io alternatives we track.