BiltOn vs Evercam
BiltOn vs Evercam, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: BiltOn is on 58/100 and Evercam on 54/100.
Where each one leads
BiltOn
- our overall score: 58/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 50/100
Evercam
- domain rating: 48/100 against 26/100
- headcount: 159 against 73
- funding raised: $63.0M against $26.0M
- LinkedIn following: 14,195 against 4,001
At a glance
| Measure | BiltOn | Evercam |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud-based platform for construction companies to supervise workflows and worker safety. | AI-powered construction site monitoring and management. |
| Category | Construction, Face Recognition, Workflow, Construction Tech | Construction, Artificial Intelligence, Proptech, Construction Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Dublin, Ireland |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | BiltOn | Evercam |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 73 | 159 |
| Total funding | $26.0M | $63.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,001 | 14,195 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | BiltOn | Evercam |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 29/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (66/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 26/100 | 48/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | BiltOn | Evercam |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Render | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Base44 | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | BiltOn | Evercam |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 5 positive, 0 negative across 5 threads |
“Evercam 4D View Helps to Leverage Engineering Data for Stakeholders.”r/ConstructionTech
BiltOn vs Evercam: common questions
Which is better, BiltOn or Evercam?
On our 0-100 score BiltOn rates higher (58/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do BiltOn and Evercam compare on the numbers?
BiltOn leads on our overall score (58/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (66/100 against 50/100). Evercam leads on domain rating (48/100 against 26/100), headcount (159 against 73), funding raised ($63.0M against $26.0M), LinkedIn following (14,195 against 4,001).
What do real users say about BiltOn and Evercam?
Evercam: 5 positive and 0 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/ConstructionTech.
Read the full BiltOn review and pricing or the Evercam review and pricing. You can also browse other BiltOn alternatives we track.