Behrman Capital vs Gryphon Investors
Behrman Capital vs Gryphon Investors, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Behrman Capital is on Not scored yet and Gryphon Investors on 40/100.
Where each one leads
Behrman Capital
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 21/100
Gryphon Investors
- domain rating: 42/100 against 28/100
- headcount: 45 against 24
- LinkedIn following: 14,497 against 1,178
At a glance
| Measure | Behrman Capital | Gryphon Investors |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Private equity firm focused on acquiring and growing middle-market companies. | A private equity firm focused on investing in and advising middle-market companies. |
| Category | Private Equity, Venture Capital, Financial Services, Business Services | Private Equity, Venture Capital, Financial Services, Business Services |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | 1992 | 1995 |
| Headquarters | Boston, USA | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Behrman Capital | Gryphon Investors |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 24 | 45 |
| Total funding | Not published | $63.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Strategic |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,178 | 14,497 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Behrman Capital | Gryphon Investors |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | Not published | 40/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 56/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 23/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 28/100 | 42/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Behrman Capital | Gryphon Investors |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Jetpack Stats | Google Analytics 4 |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Behrman Capital vs Gryphon Investors: common questions
Which is better, Behrman Capital or Gryphon Investors?
On our 0-100 score Gryphon Investors rates higher (40/100 against Not scored yet). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Behrman Capital and Gryphon Investors compare on the numbers?
Behrman Capital leads on agent readiness (39/100 against 21/100). Gryphon Investors leads on domain rating (42/100 against 28/100), headcount (45 against 24), LinkedIn following (14,497 against 1,178).
Read the full Behrman Capital review and pricing or the Gryphon Investors review and pricing. You can also browse other Behrman Capital alternatives we track.