Befesa vs GFL Environmental
Befesa vs GFL Environmental, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Befesa is on 12/100 and GFL Environmental on 29/100.
Where each one leads
Befesa
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
GFL Environmental
- our overall score: 29/100 against 12/100
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 35/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 47/100
- headcount: 8,244 against 468
At a glance
| Measure | Befesa | GFL Environmental |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Leading hazardous waste recycling services for the steel and aluminum industries, enabling the circular economy. | North American environmental services company providing waste management, water, and soil solutions. |
| Category | Industrial Services, Waste Management, Circular Economy, Environmental Services | Waste Management, Water Treatment, Soil Remediation, Environmental Services |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | 1993 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | Luxembourg, Luxembourg | Vaughan, Canada |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Befesa | GFL Environmental |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 468 | 8,244 |
| Total funding | Not published | $1.6B |
| Latest round | Not published | Post IPO |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 173,203 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Befesa | GFL Environmental |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 12/100 | 29/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Community | 10/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 9/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 15/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (35/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 47/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Befesa | GFL Environmental |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Befesa | GFL Environmental |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 4.0/5 from 1 vote | Not published |
Befesa vs GFL Environmental: common questions
Which is better, Befesa or GFL Environmental?
On our 0-100 score GFL Environmental rates higher (29/100 against 12/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Befesa and GFL Environmental compare on the numbers?
GFL Environmental leads on our overall score (29/100 against 12/100), agent readiness (39/100 against 35/100), domain rating (72/100 against 47/100), headcount (8,244 against 468).
Read the full Befesa review and pricing or the GFL Environmental review and pricing. You can also browse other Befesa alternatives we track.