Beehive.ai vs Glean
Beehive.ai vs Glean, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Beehive.ai is on 52/100 and Glean on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Beehive.ai
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Glean
- our overall score: 69/100 against 52/100
- domain rating: 78/100 against 14/100
- headcount: 1,475 against 26
- funding raised: $410M against $5.1M
- LinkedIn following: 130,056 against 1,501
At a glance
| Measure | Beehive.ai | Glean |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Generative AI platform for enterprise intelligence and customer behavior analysis. | Glean is a Work AI platform that connects to all company data, enabling employees to find, create, and automate anything with AI assistants and agents. |
| Category | Enterprise, Intelligence, Generative AI, Enterprise Software | Artificial Intelligence, Enterprise Search, Knowledge Management, Workplace AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Not published |
| Founded | 2016 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Palo Alto, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Beehive.ai | Glean |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 26 | 1,475 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +88.0% |
| Total funding | $5.1M | $410M |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.2B |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,501 | 130,056 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Beehive.ai | Glean |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 56/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (54/100) | D (57/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 14/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Beehive.ai | Glean |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Wix | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Beehive.ai | Glean |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | Glean Assistant, Glean Agents, Glean Search, Glean Protect, Connectors, APIs |
Beehive.ai vs Glean: common questions
Which is better, Beehive.ai or Glean?
On our 0-100 score Glean rates higher (69/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Beehive.ai and Glean compare on the numbers?
Glean leads on our overall score (69/100 against 52/100), domain rating (78/100 against 14/100), headcount (1,475 against 26), funding raised ($410M against $5.1M), LinkedIn following (130,056 against 1,501).
Read the full Beehive.ai review and pricing or the Glean review and pricing. You can also browse other Beehive.ai alternatives we track.