BeeEye vs Celery
BeeEye vs Celery, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: BeeEye is on 19/100 and Celery on 56/100.
Where each one leads
BeeEye
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Celery
- our overall score: 56/100 against 19/100
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 33/100
- domain rating: 27/100 against 5/100
- headcount: 35 against 8
- headcount growth: +91.0% against +3.2%
- LinkedIn following: 2,462 against 784
At a glance
| Measure | BeeEye | Celery |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Drives profitability in consumer lending by optimizing credit scoring models for financial institutions. | Automated audit layer for finance teams to reduce costs and identify financial discrepancies. |
| Category | Finance, Banking, Credit Lending, Lending | Finance, Fintech, Enterprise, Payroll |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | BeeEye | Celery |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 8 | 35 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +3.2% | +91.0% |
| Total funding | Not published | $6.3M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 784 | 2,462 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | BeeEye | Celery |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 19/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 10/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (33/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 5/100 | 27/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | BeeEye | Celery |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Nuxt, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
BeeEye vs Celery: common questions
Which is better, BeeEye or Celery?
On our 0-100 score Celery rates higher (56/100 against 19/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do BeeEye and Celery compare on the numbers?
Celery leads on our overall score (56/100 against 19/100), agent readiness (53/100 against 33/100), domain rating (27/100 against 5/100), headcount (35 against 8), headcount growth (+91.0% against +3.2%), LinkedIn following (2,462 against 784).
Read the full BeeEye review and pricing or the Celery review and pricing. You can also browse other BeeEye alternatives we track.