Beam AI vs Cognition AI
Beam AI vs Cognition AI, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Beam AI is on 44/100 and Cognition AI on 75/100.
Where each one leads
Beam AI
- headcount: 62 against 5
- LinkedIn following: 23,015 against 6,150
Cognition AI
- our overall score: 75/100 against 44/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 64/100
At a glance
| Measure | Beam AI | Cognition AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Agentic AI platform for automating complex business workflows with self-learning AI agents. | Building Devin, the first autonomous software engineer, to act as an exponential collaborator for human engineers. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Multi-Agent Systems, Workflow Automation | AI Coding Assistant, AI Copilot, Agentic AI, Foundation Model |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Beam AI | Cognition AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 62 | 5 |
| Total funding | Not published | $1.6B |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $26B |
| LinkedIn followers | 23,015 | 6,150 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Beam AI | Cognition AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 44/100 | 75/100 |
| Traction | 18/100 | 48/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 83/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 88/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 64/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Beam AI | Cognition AI |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| CMS | Framer | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Beam AI | Cognition AI |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Agentic Process Automation, Human-Level Performance AI Agents, Agent OS Platform, Multi-Agent System Integration, Industry-Specific AI Solutions, Operational Efficiency & Leverage | Not published |
Beam AI vs Cognition AI: common questions
Which is better, Beam AI or Cognition AI?
On our 0-100 score Cognition AI rates higher (75/100 against 44/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Beam AI and Cognition AI compare on the numbers?
Beam AI leads on headcount (62 against 5), LinkedIn following (23,015 against 6,150). Cognition AI leads on our overall score (75/100 against 44/100), domain rating (76/100 against 64/100).
Read the full Beam AI review and pricing or the Cognition AI review and pricing. You can also browse other Beam AI alternatives we track.