Barracuda Networks vs Cisco
Barracuda Networks vs Cisco, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Barracuda Networks is on 54/100 and Cisco on 83/100.
Where each one leads
Barracuda Networks
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 54/100
- headcount: 95,924 against 2,241
- funding raised: $220B against $130M
At a glance
| Measure | Barracuda Networks | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cybersecurity company focused on email, network access, and generative AI usage. | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence, Network Security, Email Security | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B Hardware / SaaS |
| Offering | Platform | Hardware |
| Founded | 2002 | 1984 |
| Headquarters | Campbell, USA | San Jose, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Barracuda Networks | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,241 | 95,924 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +4.2% |
| Total funding | $130M | $220B |
| Latest round | Series D | Seed |
| Valuation | $1.6B | $240B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 7,660,767 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Barracuda Networks | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 83/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 18/100 | 67/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 99/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 82/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Barracuda Networks | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Barracuda Networks vs Cisco: common questions
Which is better, Barracuda Networks or Cisco?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Barracuda Networks and Cisco compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 54/100), headcount (95,924 against 2,241), funding raised ($220B against $130M).
Read the full Barracuda Networks review and pricing or the Cisco review and pricing. You can also browse other Barracuda Networks alternatives we track.