Balderton vs Cleo Capital
Balderton vs Cleo Capital, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Balderton is on 33/100 and Cleo Capital on 44/100.
Where each one leads
Balderton
- agent readiness: 62/100 against 28/100
- funding raised: $3.0B against $3.8M
Cleo Capital
- our overall score: 44/100 against 33/100
At a glance
| Measure | Balderton | Cleo Capital |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A venture capital firm investing in early-stage European technology companies. | Venture capital firm focused on early-stage European tech startups. |
| Category | Venture Capital, Fintech, B2B SaaS, Digital Health | Venture Capital, Fintech, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | 1999 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Balderton | Cleo Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 9 |
| Total funding | $3.0B | $3.8M |
| Latest round | Early Stage Fund IX | Pre-Seed |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 6,528 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Balderton | Cleo Capital |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 33/100 | 44/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 43/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 12/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 11/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (62/100) | F (28/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 66/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Balderton | Cleo Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Balderton vs Cleo Capital: common questions
Which is better, Balderton or Cleo Capital?
On our 0-100 score Cleo Capital rates higher (44/100 against 33/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Balderton and Cleo Capital compare on the numbers?
Balderton leads on agent readiness (62/100 against 28/100), funding raised ($3.0B against $3.8M). Cleo Capital leads on our overall score (44/100 against 33/100).
Read the full Balderton review and pricing or the Cleo Capital review and pricing. You can also browse other Balderton alternatives we track.